|
If you’re within a few years of retirement and have built meaningful wealth, a quiet but persistent question tends to surface—often during market volatility or unsettling headlines:
Am I taking too much market risk right now? This isn’t a beginner’s question. It usually comes from people who have done almost everything right. The concern isn’t whether markets go up or down—it's whether a bad stretch at the wrong time could permanently change retirement plans. At this stage, the real danger isn’t daily volatility. It’s what’s known as sequence-of-returns risk—poor market returns early in retirement combined with withdrawals. A significant drawdown at 35 is inconvenient. A significant drawdown at 62 can force uncomfortable trade-offs: spending cuts, delayed retirement, or higher stress for years. That’s why the common advice to “just use a 60/40 portfolio” often falls flat. Portfolio percentages don’t capture what actually matters: how your lifestyle is funded during the first several years of retirement. They also don’t capture the fact that the trend in interest rates is likely up for the next decade or more. That could mean that bonds don’t offer the same kind of uncorrelated returns as they have over the past 40 years of declining yields. A more useful question than “What allocation should I have?” is this: How much of my near-term spending depends on the market cooperating right away? One helpful way to think about risk is in dollars, not percentages. A 20% decline doesn’t feel the same when a portfolio is $4 million. Seeing paper losses measured in six or seven figures can trigger emotional decisions—even for disciplined investors. If a downturn would pressure you to abandon your plan, that’s a sign risk may be misaligned with behavior. Another blind spot is return dependency. If retirement “works” only if markets deliver strong returns immediately, the plan is fragile. A resilient plan allows for mediocre or poor early years without forcing lifestyle changes. Taxes also quietly amplify risk. Two investors with the same allocation can experience very different outcomes depending on where assets are held, how withdrawals are planned, and when gains are realized. Near retirement, investment risk and tax risk are inseparable. What usually helps isn’t drastic action—like moving everything to cash or bonds—but structure. Clear rules around withdrawals, rebalancing, and funding early retirement years reduce decision‑making under stress. Many investors benefit from a defined “retirement runway”: assets intended to cover near‑term spending, so they’re not forced to sell growth investments at unfavorable times. To make this real, consider a simple sample stress test: Assume:
Now apply a conservative stress scenario:
Ask yourself:
If this scenario creates discomfort or forces hard trade‑offs, the issue isn’t the portfolio’s long‑term return—it’s how risk is positioned around the retirement transition. The goal near retirement is no longer maximizing returns. It’s confidence that your plan can survive a tough stretch without forcing permanent changes. That requires clarity, not predictions. If you’re approaching retirement, ask yourself:
Answering those questions early turns uncertainty into preparation—and often makes retirement feel far more manageable long before it begins.
0 Comments
In Part One, we discussed the emotional and financial challenge of moving from accumulation to distribution—especially for disciplined savers who have done “everything right.” Now let’s bring that concept to life with a practical, realistic example.
A Detailed Example: From Lifetime Saver to Confident Distributor Meet Tom and Susan
Their Financial Snapshot
Despite their strong balance sheet, Tom and Susan shared a common concern: “We know we should be able to spend more… but we’re not sure it’s safe.” The Accumulation Mindset at Work Tom and Susan spent 30+ years saving aggressively. They were comfortable:
Now, even though retirement had arrived, their behavior hadn’t changed. They were:
This is where accumulation comfort quietly turns into distribution paralysis. Step One: Establishing Spending Confidence (Not Just a Withdrawal Rate) Rather than starting with a generic rule of thumb, we walked through:
Result: They could comfortably spend $90,000–$100,000 per year without jeopardizing long‑term security. The key shift? They stopped viewing spending as “losing money” and started seeing it as executing a plan. Step Two: Strategic Use of Lower‑Income Years Because Tom and Susan retired before Social Security began, they entered a multi‑year lower‑tax window. We analyzed:
Outcome:
Instead of reacting to taxes later, they chose to plan proactively while rates were favorable. Step Three: Redesigning the Investment Strategy for Distribution During accumulation, Tom and Susan focused almost entirely on growth. In distribution, we restructured assets to support:
This included:
The goal wasn’t to eliminate volatility—it was to make volatility livable. Step Four: Reframing the Purpose of Their Money Perhaps the most meaningful change wasn’t financial—it was emotional. With a clear plan in place, Tom and Susan:
They didn’t abandon discipline. They redirected it toward living well. The Takeaway Accumulation answers the question: “Will I have enough?” Distribution answers a more important one: “How do I use what I’ve saved wisely, confidently, and purposefully?” Without a plan, many retirees default to underspending. With the right plan, spending becomes intentional—not fearful. Step Five: How We Help in This Phase We support this transition through:
If you’ve mastered accumulation, distribution is simply the next skill to learn—and you don’t have to learn it alone. Click here to reach out to us. For decades, the financial message has been simple: save more, spend less, invest wisely.
And if you’re in your late 50s or 60s and reading this post, chances are you have listened. You maxed out retirement plans, avoided lifestyle creep, paid off debt, and built a solid nest egg. Saving became more than a strategy—it became a habit. For many, it became part of their identity. But here’s the challenge few people talk about: The skills that helped you win the accumulation game are not the same skills required to thrive in retirement. At some point—often in your 60s—you must shift from accumulation to distribution. That transition isn’t just financial. It’s emotional, psychological, and deeply personal. The Comfort (and Trap) of Accumulation Here is a fact for most of us accumulators: accumulation feels safe. You save. You invest. You watch balances grow. Progress is visible and measurable. Isn’t whoever dies with the most stuff wins? Obviously, that is not the case but that is the way your mind has functioned for much of our working lives. Distribution, on the other hand, feels uncomfortable. You’re no longer adding—you’re withdrawing. Account balances may fluctuate or even decline, even if your plan is working exactly as designed. For lifelong savers, this can create a quiet fear:
As a result, many retirees underspend—not because they can’t afford to spend, but because they’re afraid to. Ironically, this often leads to a different kind of risk: not fully living during the years when health, energy, and opportunity are greatest. Distribution Is Not “Spending Freely”—It’s Spending Intentionally Moving into distribution does not mean abandoning discipline. It means redirecting it. Instead of asking: “How much can I save?” You begin asking: “How can I responsibly use what I’ve saved to support the life I want—now and later?” A solid distribution plan answers three critical questions:
Practical Tips for Shifting from Accumulation to Distribution Here are several practical steps for those who are very good at saving but need help learning how to distribute. 1. Separate “Spending Safety” from “Account Balances” One of the biggest mindset shifts is realizing that a stable retirement is built on cash flow, not account values alone. Instead of focusing solely on:
Shift attention to:
When you know your spending is supported—even in down markets—it becomes easier to enjoy your money without guilt. 2. Understand That Distribution Rates Are Personal The old “4% rule” can be a starting reference, but it is not a plan. A responsible distribution strategy considers:
For some households, spending more earlier makes sense. For others, smoothing withdrawals over time creates peace of mind. The key is this: distribution should be intentional, not reactive. 3. Use Lower-Income Years Strategically (Especially for Roth Conversions) Many retirees experience a “tax valley”:
These years can be ideal for:
This is not about guessing tax laws—it’s about planning within today’s rules while maintaining flexibility. 4. Reframe Spending as a Tool, not a Threat For lifelong savers, spending can feel like failure. Instead, try reframing:
Money unused is not inherently virtuous. Money aligned with values, purpose, and stewardship often is. 5. Shift Investment Strategy from “Maximum Growth” to “Durable Growth” Distribution portfolios still need growth—but they also need:
This often means structuring assets so that:
The goal is confidence—not chasing returns. How We Help During This Transition This accumulation‑to‑distribution shift is exactly where planning adds the most value. We help by providing:
The Real Goal: Confidence to Live Well The purpose of saving wasn’t to see the biggest possible account balance on a statement. It was to create:
Shifting from accumulation to distribution isn’t about letting go of discipline. It’s about redirecting discipline toward living wisely, generously, and confidently. If you’ve spent a lifetime doing the hard part—saving—you deserve a plan that helps you enjoy the fruit of that effort. If you’d like help navigating that transition, a Free 15 Minute Retirement Check‑In can be a great place to start. A Roth IRA conversion lets you move money from a regular IRA into a Roth IRA. You pay taxes now, but the money grows tax‑free after that. Many people use this strategy as part of their financial planning, especially when they are getting ready to retire. Roth conversions can help:
Roth IRA conversions are a popular financial planning topic, especially regarding their timing and suitability. Previously, I argued that converting makes clear sense for clients facing an estate tax, since it lowers the taxable estate’s size. That article was called “Shrinking the Estate, Growing the Legacy: Why Roth Conversions Can Be a Beautiful Thing.” Another straightforward planning opportunity is converting IRAs to Roth IRAs when you anticipate a period of lower taxable income. This allows one to level out their income and avoid higher tax brackets (or IRMAA problems) later as government mandated RMDs (required minimum distributions) force traditional IRA distributions. A Simple Example Let’s look at a couple--John and Mary.
This rise in income can push them into a higher tax bracket (as noted below). How Roth Conversions Help Between ages 65 and 69, John and Mary have a window where their income is lower. This is a great time to convert some of their IRA money into a Roth IRA. By paying some taxes now:
Note: the spike in estimated income tax at ages 89-90 is due to the couple being self-insured for long-term care. They withdrew heavily from tax-deferred assets to cover these costs, leading to higher potential taxable income during those years. Why Roth IRAs Help Your Family Too
A Roth IRA has no required minimum distributions (RMDs). If John and Mary leave Roth IRAs to their children:
Want to Know If a Roth Conversion Is Right for You? If you want help deciding, reach out to our team at InTrust Advisors. We offer wealth management and financial planning designed to help you keep more of your hard‑earned money and build a strong retirement. Click the link to schedule a free consultation. Markets often rise due to a steady flow of investment dollars from retirement plans and pensions. Millions of workers contribute to 401(k)s and pension funds every month, and this money is automatically invested in stocks and bonds. This creates constant demand, called by some the giant mindless robot, pushes prices higher—even when some investors sell or economic news is negative. This “passive flow” is now one of the most important forces driving markets upward. What Is Fiscal Dominance and How Does It Affect Markets?
Another factor in market resilience is fiscal dominance. Fiscal dominance means the government is spending large amounts of taxpayer money through deficits and direct-to-consumer programs. This artificial stimulus can drive markets higher, making traditional signals like company valuations or earnings less relevant than before. What Risks Could Cause Markets to Fall? Does this mean markets will never fall? Certainly not, here are some risk factors that can impact this steady flow of funds:
What Should Investors Do to Protect Their Portfolios?
How Can InTrust Advisors Help? At InTrust Advisors, we prioritize process over prediction. We use a disciplined risk management process and careful analysis to protect client capital, helping you navigate changing markets with clarity and confidence. Worried About Your Portfolio? Are you nervous about your portfolio? Why not get a Free Second Opinion? FIND OUT MORE HERE. |